66 pages • 2 hours read
A modern alternative to SparkNotes and CliffsNotes, SuperSummary offers high-quality Study Guides with detailed chapter summaries and analysis of major themes, characters, and more.
Summary
Chapter Summaries & Analyses
Character Analysis
Themes
Symbols & Motifs
Literary Devices
Important Quotes
Essay Topics
Further Reading & Resources
Tools
Ailey’s gradual development into a historian exemplifies Jeffers’s theme of the centrality of narrative to an individual’s or family’s sense of identity. In fact, history and its preservation are foundational to many of the African cultures from which Ailey and other Black Americans are partially descended, as Jeffers’s discussion of griots makes explicit: “Midas knew from his mother’s stories that her father had been a man whose job it was to remember the history of a single family in their village, going back for hundreds of years” (196). For the descendants of enslaved people, however, historical family narratives are often irretrievable because slave owners did not always keep detailed records about their enslaved workers. Pieces of data as basic as names can be difficult to research, as slave owners sometimes changed slaves’ first or last names, failed to call slaves any name at all, or gave slaves no last name. Furthermore, slavery often disrupted the oral histories that enslaved people might have relied on, impeding the transmission of information from one generation to the next with repeated dislocations and separations.
Anyone trying to research a family genealogy that involves enslaved people, therefore, commonly runs into gaps in the archive. Even if they manage the daunting task of tracing the genealogy back to the first enslaved ancestor in the US, there is often no way to discover that person’s home before they were kidnapped. In an interview with Rachel Barenbaum, Jeffers explains that she employs scholar Sadiya Hartman’s concept of “critical fabulation” to fill in the gaps (Barenbaum, Rachel. “Ep 72 Honoree Fanonne Jeffers: Love Songs of W.E.B. Dubois.” YouTube, 2 Sept. 2021). This is a method by which a writer combines historical research with creative fiction in order to craft a story that fills in the gaps left incomplete in archival materials alone. Jeffers used critical fabulation directly in a book of poetry she wrote about Phillis Wheatley called The Age of Phillis. Since The Love Songs of W.E.B. Du Bois is a fictional story, it does not blend documented and imagined history in this way. However, Jeffers does demonstrate the spirit of critical fabulation by juxtaposing the information Ailey can glean from the historical archive with a much richer, deeper narrative about the same people in the “Song” sections.
Rather than thinking of her maternal family history as something that controls her, Ailey thinks of it as something that informs and inspires her, giving her a greater appreciation of the family around her and their remarkable triumphs in the face of adversities. Ultimately, Jeffers frames the act of digging deeply into histories once deemed unworthy of recording as an act of reclamation. By continuously searching for her family’s story, Ailey reclaims the humanity of her family and community from those who once denied them the dignity of narrative.
What’s more, uncovering these stories and internalizing them expands one’s community in a way that parallels the novel’s depiction of time and history themselves. The first “Song” section suggests that linear, narrative time is in some sense artificial; the narrator(s) “keep to the guidance of time” for convenience’s sake (3), but in reality each person’s story extends in multiple directions, not just forwards and backwards. The idea that time is not linear but (for example) cyclical is one that many African and Indigenous American cultures hold, and its influence permeates the structure of the book itself, which skips freely through time. Ailey’s ancestors are therefore not simply the founders of her community but continuous members of it, as the dreams in which they offer comfort and guidance imply. Ailey’s research is work worthy of doing even when the answers cannot be found because it is an act of community-building both in the moment and across generations.
Generational trauma exerts enormous physical, spiritual, and economic effects not just on Ailey’s family but on many family lines throughout the novel. Ailey’s family, of course, has experienced the trauma of slavery and the subsequent Jim Crow era, during which financial precarity and the constant threat of physical danger loomed over their family and community. While the novel stops following Micco’s family line (except for Lady) at a certain point, we know that he, his wife, and his sons were forced to move west after the passage of the Indian Removal Act of 1830. The impacts of this legislation were (and are) many and complex, irreversibly impacting Indigenous American economic opportunities and enshrining an institutional disregard for tribal sovereignty that activists are still fighting against today.
Even the Franklin family, villainous though they often are, experience generational trauma. Aidan Franklin loses his wife and 11 out of 12 children in the space of a year, only to then also lose his economic security when his crops fail. Admittedly, he did not start from a position of pure innocence, as he moved onto land that the US government took from Indigenous tribes to give to European settlers. Even this act of dispossession has its roots in another, however; Gideon Franklin first came to America after his arrest for poaching on what was once common land later appropriated by the English aristocracy. Like the sexual abuse that Samuel Pinchard first suffers and then perpetrates, the Franklins’ story illustrates how trauma can multiply on itself. The massive and sudden loss in the Franklin family reverberates through the generations; the family is never able to regain a firm financial foothold, and they vent their anger on those even less fortunate than themselves.
Not all characters turn their trauma outwards, however. Generational trauma affects Ailey in ways both obvious and less obvious. When she reads about slave auctions and Wood Place’s history, she has to follow Dr. Oludara’s prescription to “shower and pray” when she goes home or she finds herself physically ill. She has to cleanse her body and her soul of the details of the trauma before moving on with a normal day. Further, her family still has to exercise caution around Sheriff Franklin, descendant of Aidan, late into the 20th century because of the inherited war the Franklins feel they must wage on the Black descendants of Wood Place.
While Ailey’s family and community have inherited generational trauma, they have, at the same time, cultivated coping skills. Ailey immediately finds the one Black-owned restaurant in town when she moves to North Carolina so that she has a home base at which to feel relaxed—a place where the sensation of double consciousness abates for a time. Dr. Whitcomb, her advisor, also looks out for her, having learned himself how difficult it is to study slavery among so many people whose families have not been affected by it the way his and Ailey’s have. Many of the supernatural elements of the novel, such as Joe’s occasional appearances or Aggie’s appearances to the Garfield women in dreams, present a further sense that some spiritual presence in the world is helping Ailey’s family navigate the effects of generational trauma.
During Ailey’s college years at Routledge, she participates in debates about feminism with her peers, but these debates are only the most overt expression of feminist themes that implicitly undergird the entire novel. In Dr. Oludara’s classroom, most of Ailey’s peers reject feminism as a movement only for white women. Their position is not difficult to understand; one has only to think of the dozens of rapes of Black women and girls that occur in the “Song” sections to realize that white women have frequently done nothing to protect the nation’s most vulnerable women. Moreover, landmark feminist texts like The Feminine Mystique describe gendered problems that afflict middle- or upper-class women, ignoring the different sets of gendered problems that arise for poor women and/or women of color.
However, the novel offers many examples of Black women (and even, occasionally, men) doing the feminist work of supporting one another and asserting themselves in male-controlled spaces. Aggie, for instance, uses every tool at her disposal to protect the girls in her care, going so far as to scar Eliza Two to render her unattractive to Samuel. Absorbing these lessons of survival from her grandmother, Eliza Two learns how to make Victor feel that she respects and admires him in order to ensure he is always amenable to her requests for the things her community needs. In Ailey’s timeline, Dr. Oludara mentors Ailey to ensure her success in the world of academia, where both her Blackness and her womanhood put her at a disadvantage. Moreover, while Uncle Root does not identify as a feminist, his actions align with feminist principles: He explicitly instructs his students to recognize and honor the often invisible labor of Black women and, like Dr. Oludara, encourages Ailey to reach her full potential.
While Ailey’s classmates have a point about feminism’s historical exclusions, Ailey learns that she can practice her own version of feminism that takes into account the realities of the Black experience in the US. In the interview with Barenbaum, Jeffers explains how the concept of Black feminism differs from the feminism of someone like Friedan: “Particularly with Black Feminism […] you’re not just concerned about Black women. You’re concerned about the entire community—Black children, Black men, you’ve got to think about everybody, not just yourself” (Barenbaum, Rachel. “Ep 72 Honoree Fanonne Jeffers: Love Songs of W.E.B. Dubois.” YouTube, 2 Sept. 2021). In other words, Black feminism is a movement that takes into account the apparatus of institutional racism and its effects on the Black community as a whole. The term “intersectionality” is often used to describe this practice of thinking about how race, class, gender, and other factors all work together to impact a person’s ability to thrive in the world.
The novel also does not preclude the possibility of an interracial feminism, offering an example of two women of different races who support each other unconditionally: Belle and her sister-in-law, Diane. Diane considers herself an enthusiastic ally of the Black community, and she is mostly correct in this self-assessment. She does not always behave perfectly; sometimes she fails to realize the ways in which Belle’s life is harder because of her Blackness and thus overestimates the comparability of her and Belle’s lives. However, she proves herself willing to learn and grow. Moreover, she and Belle are always willing to help each other at a moment’s notice. Through episodes of marital infidelity, health crises, and national disaster, these women never fail to carry one another’s burdens. Their friendship posits the possibility of more privileged women learning to consider and advocate for their less privileged peers.
Plus, gain access to 8,800+ more expert-written Study Guides.
Including features: