50 pages • 1 hour read
A modern alternative to SparkNotes and CliffsNotes, SuperSummary offers high-quality Study Guides with detailed chapter summaries and analysis of major themes, characters, and more.
Elizabeth Costello is a fictional well-known author from Australia, and she is the mother of John Bernard. Although her career is in writing, Elizabeth has taken a strong interest in animal rights. She wants to use her platform to support this cause. She is both a narrator and a protagonist, although her characterization is non-traditional due to the metafiction genre of the text. Elizabeth is intelligent and well-spoken, conflicted, and hypocritical in her values. She has a tendency toward rambling, but when viewed from afar, her lectures have a notably logical structure which mirrors her arguments against using only reason-based thinking. Although she is an animal rights activist, Elizabeth admittedly does not know her own intentions and wears leather while scorning the exploitation of animals.
Elizabeth is a non-traditional protagonist because she is a flat character, a trait common in allegories and metafiction. The dynamics of the story are carried within the lectures and discussions, the plot, and the themes, rather than through the characters. By writing Elizabeth and the other characters as static, Coetzee focuses on the novel’s themes and philosophical ideas. Elizabeth is an auxiliary narrator; she transitions into a narrating role while giving her lectures and responding to O’Hearne’s questioning.
John Bernard is Elizabeth’s son, Norma’s husband, and a father. He is an assistant professor at Appleton College, and he teaches both astronomy and physics. The narration is delivered through his perspective though via third-person limited narration. John is a non-traditional protagonist through his static nature and privileged perspective in the story’s narration. He is antagonistic towards his mother’s views and presence.
John displays self-centered and pessimistic traits. He focuses on the potential negative outcomes of Elizabeth’s visit, and he worries how they will affect him. His most prominent concerns include Norma’s complaints and his colleagues’ judgments—a largely irrational fear. John cannot understand his mother’s perspective. His inability to empathize demonstrates Elizabeth’s argument that some individuals are not capable of or refuse to use sympathy-based thinking. John has a strong, albeit misplaced, sense of responsibility. He feels he must control both Norma and Elizabeth and manage the results of Elizabeth’s visit. He is a flat character, and neither his opinions nor his attitude change because of his mother’s visit.
Norma is a scholar, a mother, and John’s wife. She has a Ph.D. in Philosophy, and she specialized in “philosophy of the mind” (17). Norma wants to teach but has not found an applicable position, so she is writing for a philosophy journal. Norma is an antagonistic, flat side character. She is portrayed as a stereotypical nagging wife who does not like her mother-in-law. Her role is to contrast Elizabeth’s views and add tension to the narrative.
Norma brings tension to the story through her disagreement with and disrespect toward Elizabeth. She creates tension in every scene she is present: She avoids answering Elizabeth when Elizabeth asks why the children are dining separately, attempts to ask a question after Elizabeth’s first lecture, and argues against Elizabeth during the Appleton College dinner. Norma disagrees with Elizabeth’s views. However, other than the counterclaims she brings up at the dinner, Norma does not openly disagree with Elizabeth. Instead, she criticizes Elizabeth’s views to John when they are alone. This suggests that although Norma does not respect nor like Elizabeth, she tries to treat her with kindness. Norma represents individuals who support science as objective, who value reason-based thinking, and who do not value sympathy-based thinking or literature.
O’Hearne is a Philosophy professor at Appleton College. He is described as a “large, blond man” (59), and he is a flat, antagonistic side character who, like Norma, serves to contrast Elizabeth’s views. By debating against Elizabeth, O’Hearne provides Elizabeth with the chance to address counterarguments that did not arise during her lectures or the dinner. This, in turn, further develops the argument against animal cruelty and inspires a sympathetic opinion toward Elizabeth.
O’Hearne is similar to Norma; they are in the same field, and they share similar viewpoints. However, when examined through a feminist lens, the differences between Norma and O’Hearne makes O’Hearne a symbol of the sexism often found in science and academic fields. His physical description as “large” acts as a symbol of his privilege, and he holds a teaching position, while Norma is unable to find a teaching role. O’Hearne is also able to debate Elizabeth in an academic context, where Norma is denied that chance, thus disempowering her perspective as she is seen as merely a nagging wife.
Plus, gain access to 8,800+ more expert-written Study Guides.
Including features:
By J. M. Coetzee