40 pages • 1 hour read
A modern alternative to SparkNotes and CliffsNotes, SuperSummary offers high-quality Study Guides with detailed chapter summaries and analysis of major themes, characters, and more.
At its thematic center, Saints at the River is an environmental parable that argues nature itself is on the run. For Rash, nature is an absolute force that disregards humanity’s assorted dramas and tragedies. In the face of our concerted efforts to destroy nature in incremental bits, however, we are losing more than we are gaining. It is not just nature’s beauty we are losing, but rather, we are losing the nearest we have to the sublime power Christians accord to their God.
Rash is, at heart, a poet, and the narrative offers wonderfully vivid details of the Appalachian wilderness and the river itself, lyrical moments that recreate the experience of engaging nature. However, Rash also offers a stern lesson to a new millennium audience certain that they have become the stewards of nature. Rash’s environmentalists understand that their organized protests, their websites that promote activism, and even the legislation designed to save the wilderness pale next to the majesty and the muscle of nature itself. They understand they are losing in their efforts to preserve that majesty. There is no more poignant moment in the narrative than the sorrow in Luke’s eyes as he watches the bulldozers move in to cut the first gash into the river.
Rash’s environmental narrative counsels humility and respect in the face of natural power—that is exactly what those who are engaged in the business of interfering with the river entirely lack. The reality is that Ruth Kowalsky should have respected the power of the river, despite her Red Cross swimming badges and her brash self-confidence. The town’s rescue workers should have respected the power of the river, despite their heroic intentions and their years of experience. The grieving family should respect the river, despite the magnitude of their sorrow. As Luke argues at the town meeting, “I’d want [Ruth] where she’d be part of something pure and good and unchanging, the closest thing to Eden we’ve got left” (53). It is Rash’s larger theme that in denying the power of nature, we lose touch with what speaks most deeply to our hearts and to our souls.
Rash is fascinated by the dynamics of change and by the inevitability of impermanence, and specifically, how his characters (and his Southern culture) handle living within a world constantly in flux. In just three days, for instance, both Maggie and Allen undergo tectonic changes in their emotional and psychological profile; both begin the narrative solitary and apart and both move toward a willingness to engage another. Under the pressure of her father’s approaching death, both Maggie and her father move away from a decade of estrangement and emotional distance to try to find their way to genuine communication. Indeed, the kitchen accident years earlier, an event no one could have anticipated, wrought devastating changes to the Glenn family. In addition, we watch as both the Kowalsky and Moseley families adjust to the impact of unexpected deaths, a pattern of profound emotional trauma reflected as well in Allen Hemphill’s struggle to cope with the accident that took his family.
Rash, however, offers a far wider sense of the implications of change than the psychological evolution of his principal characters. The South itself is changing. The culture of the rural Appalachian South, recreated in the music revue at the local barbeque and later in the memorial service at the river, are changing. As Maggie notes, the population of Tamassee is aging, and the younger generation opting to follow education opportunities and a 21st century job market that does not rely on agriculture. Families are breaking apart. The town itself edges toward obscurity; its residents bound more by memories than dreams. Without preaching and without insisting that time should somehow stand still, Rash introduces a cluster of forward-thinking developers without demonizing them. They see the opportunity to begin long-term plans to entirely redefine the natural landscape around the town as an avenue toward the region’s economic recovery. Indeed, despite its reassuring sense of permanence and sheer there-ness, the Appalachian wilderness itself as the novel closes begins to undergo transformation from wilderness to commodity.
We begin the narrative as witnesses to the death of a child. Rash sees the reality of death as an element of human experience that both shapes and defines character. The experience of loss shapes all relationships in the novel, and each of the principal characters, in turn, is tested against how they handle that experience. Death can be unexpected, an accident that intrudes irrevocably on what otherwise was a normal and uneventful day. A young girl stumbles in a spring-fed river; a driver slides across the median during a heavy rain; a rescue worker is swamped by the force of a river. Death can be far less dramatic, like cancer eroding slowly through a body.
For most of the town, itself long rooted in the Christian traditions, death is a translation into a higher reality. It’s a glorious and mysterious transition of the soul into an afterlife. The promise of resurrection animates the memorial service at the river. Of course, Rash is not so sure. Even as the congregation celebrates the promise of resurrection, the river finally releases the very dead (and decomposing) bodies of both Ruth and Randy, a gruesome literal resurrection that horrifies the congregation.
Without the reassuring language and radiant metaphors of Christianity, characters struggle to handle the experience of death. Ruth’s parents, although nominally Christian, cannot draw their strength from that transcendent faith. They are parents who cannot rest until the body of their daughter is reclaimed from river. For his part, Allen collapses in the traumatic aftermath of the deaths of his wife and daughter. He withdraws from engaging life, his vulnerability exposed. His retreat into guilt and regret signals a surrender, counterproductive and ultimately dead-end, to the fear of mortality.
In the end, it is Maggie who best comes to terms with the experience of death. When her mother got sick, she was able to escape the responsibility by going off to college. In the narrative present, she initially turns down her brother’s plea to help care for her father. In the experience of the dead girl in the river, however, she comes to embrace the reality that the father she has struggled to love is dying. That is her moment of emotional resurrection, suggested by the recurring dream of her emerging from murky river water. In his closing months, Maggie stops retreating. Death becomes a reality. She accepts the responsibility of caring for her father. That, for Rash, is perhaps the noblest gesture any of us can offer in the face of loss: tender support and quiet care for each other.
Against a wilderness that has no memory is, as such, un-haunted, Rash’s characters struggle with the weight of memory. Maggie and Allen are both haunted; they both live in two tenses simultaneously: the past and the present. Because Maggie tells the story, we most directly share her experience of the past. As she returns to her hometown, everything returns her to her past: lost loves, lingering regrets, profound guilt, and deep-seated anger.
Rash suggests we have two strategies for handling the impress of memory, one corrosive and destructive, the other beneficial and productive. We can retreat into bitterness or experience the redemptive freedom of acceptance. Allen and Maggie, for instance, stew in regrets. He cannot shake the feeling that he never provided sufficient love and attention to his family. Maggie cannot find her way around the memory of the night she and her brother were left alone by her father. Her sense responsibility for the accident have left her unable to find comfort or solace in her family, despite her brother’s example.
We are vulnerable, Rash’s narrative reminds us, to emotional scarring because we cannot accept our helplessness. The reality we see if Maggie does not is that she had no control over the events of that night any more than Allen had over the events on the highway to the airport. Because we are so impotent in the face of blind chance and bad luck, we cannot accept that vulnerability. We like to believe we can control events—but like the raging and wild Tamassee, reality surges far beyond our puny control. Luke understands this. The townspeople understand this—they are tuned to the code of the wilderness, despite their embrace of Christianity. In the end, both Maggie and Allen come to understand that as well, and both, in turn, find the peace that eluded them by letting go of the burden of memory.
Plus, gain access to 8,800+ more expert-written Study Guides.
Including features:
By Ron Rash