93 pages • 3 hours read
A modern alternative to SparkNotes and CliffsNotes, SuperSummary offers high-quality Study Guides with detailed chapter summaries and analysis of major themes, characters, and more.
Humes describes the old building of Central lockup as desolation among urbanity; the one billboard inmates can see showing the King of Beepers:
his product is especially popular with the hundreds of drug dealers, gangbangers, and assorted other criminals who pass by his shrewdly placed advertisement in shackles each day, for whom beepers are both status symbols and necessary tools of the trade in this information age (12).
He shows readers the parking lot where people hurry to their cars at night when new inmates arrive at Central. Humes describes the smells—urine and sickly sweet disinfectant—as well as the constant electric buzzing and alarm sounds. He describes the intake process, wherein interviews are conducted as briefly as possible. He reiterates the officers’ beliefs that the people who are coming through are changing—rich teens, a woman—although the crimes stay the same. Murder is becoming usual crime, although Geri Vance—charged with the murder of his motel-robbing accomplice who was killed by a motel employee during the robbery—is unusual.
Geri is confused at the charges leveled against him, arguing that he was forced to take part in the robbery: “There is an earnestness in Geri’s manner and words that even the jaded Intake Officer can see” (14). Humes compares Geri’s situation to that of Ronald Duncan, who confessed to killing and robbing his employers. Humes believes that Geri tried to save a life—that of his co-conspirator—while Duncan willingly killed two people for a petty reason. Vance will most likely face life in prison with no possibility for parole while Duncan will serve at most eight years in a juvenile facility, after which his record will be sealed.
In Humes’s writing class, 15-to-17-year-old boys read poems they have written about their lives. Humes’ students include Vance and Duncan. They talk about how society perceives them to be monsters and the lessons they learned from street life. One Sureño speaks about how he never learned how to be a father. They talk about the ineffectiveness of probation and how gangs recruit at the county-run boot camps for delinquent youth. Elias talks about how this life was the only one he ever knew, and now that he is going to be a father he wants to change but it is too late. Elias says that people have to want to change; the system is never going to make them change: “There is nothing more sad than the sight of hopelessness in one so young. It is a look that seems, for the moment, to be reflected in every boy’s face in the room” (19).
Humes begins with a sensory description of Central lockup to allow his audience to see and feel the dehumanization and shallowness associated with the intake process. This sensory description allows the audience to experience it as though the process is happening to them, forcing them to care about the lives of these boys, whom society has essentially thrown away. Humes personalizes the experience by connecting through sensory details that are then juxtaposed against the mechanized intake process, which resembles a factory assembly line. Readers also witness how incredibly arbitrary the intake process is, and one that is entirely up to the discretion of the Intake Officer. Readers also see the paradox between the arbitrary distribution of this immense and potentially life-changing power as Humes readily admits that the more people there are in lock-up, the more lenient the Intake Officer will be. In this case, an inmate’s position in the line itself could determine the trajectory of their life: whether you will end up in prison or be free from the system depends entirely on the mood and perception of the Intake Officer.
Humes also seeks to address the arbitrary and seemingly-ridiculous nature of the justice system in his comparison between Vance and Duncan. Through this comparison, Humes argues that some people, like Duncan, are merely born bad while others, like Vance, are the product of a series of miscalculations and poor environments. However, Humes’ analysis fails to take into account the fact that Duncan clearly does not understand the severity of the situation; Duncan is smiling, asking if he can go home, indicating that he is perhaps not mentally competent to understand what he is being charged with. The author presumes guilt primarily because of Duncan’s confession; however, this assumption fails to take into account the reality that these confessions are extracted from teenagers after hours of interrogation and false promises, usually without either parental or legal guidance. Despite the problems readily apparent within the justice system, Humes assumes that the various actors in positions of power—the prosecution, the police officers, etc.—all have society’s best interest at heart; essentially, he seems to assume that their actions and motives are above reproach. This idea can be seen as naïve and as demonstrating Humes’s distance from the criminal justice system itself.
Plus, gain access to 8,800+ more expert-written Study Guides.
Including features: