logo

94 pages 3 hours read

Anna Karenina

Fiction | Novel | Adult | Published in 1879

A modern alternative to SparkNotes and CliffsNotes, SuperSummary offers high-quality Study Guides with detailed chapter summaries and analysis of major themes, characters, and more.

Part 3Chapter Summaries & Analyses

Part 3, Chapters 1-12 Summary

Levin’s brother Sergei visits him and is intent on leisure, contrasting Levin’s own busy schedule and constant farming demands. Like many intellectuals of his class, Sergei idolizes the peasants as more noble than other Russians, while Levin’s own experiences show him that peasants are flawed and averse to modern farming. Levin thinks that his brother has distant intellectual attitudes toward morality. Preoccupied with his hay crop, Levin takes his brother fishing.

The brothers argue over the new zemstvo institutions, as Sergei insists that Levin’s disinterest in them shows a lack of commitment to the peasantry. Levin claims the institutions do not benefit him, though peasant emancipation did. As the solution to his distress, Levin decides to mow hay with the peasants, and finds that in this area he is less skilled than his workers. His mood and his technique gradually improve. He has “blissful moments” (252) of labor with no other thoughts but the rhythm of his work. When he returns home to dinner with his brother, Levin gets a letter from Oblonsky informing him Dolly is nearby at her estate and could use his help.

The narrative shifts to the Oblonsky’s perspective: Dolly is in the country partly in hope to spend less due to Stiva’s debts. The estate is in disrepair and Dolly finds herself ill-suited to running a country house; she finds herself relying on an industrious servant. Dolly devotes herself to her children as a distraction from her unhappy marriage, finding that distance from Moscow helps her appreciate them more. She uses the time away to make sure her children are in good standing with the Orthodox Church and has them take communion. Her joy in this is spoiled as her children quarrel with each other. The family goes mushroom picking—a common Russian country pastime. The children bathe in the woods and Dolly finds herself chatting with peasant women, taking particular interest in their family lives. She feels better knowing they admire her family.

A as the family rides back, Levin arrives and delicately tries to spare Dolly’s feelings about her marital situation. To take his mind off the news that Kitty is planning to visit, Levin attempts to give Dolly advise about her estate’s cows. Dolly tries to help Levin understand Kitty’s choice was due to inexperience and uncertainty; she urges him to let go of his “pride” (270). Levin insists he will avoid Kitty if she visits, and is unhappy with Dolly’s parenting—especially her children speaking French at home; Dolly is embarrassed when her children argue.

Levin returns home to investigate his hay fields, struck by the apparent love between a young peasant and his wife as they work. For all his discontent with peasant attitudes toward technology and work, Levin admires the cheerful atmosphere and sense of common purpose. He asks himself how he can live a good life, wanting a deeper purpose to his existence. Just as he thinks it is time to abandon marriage for this moral life of labor, he sees Kitty’s carriage passing on the road and realizes he is still in love with her.

Part 3 Chapters 12-23 Summary

The narrative returns to Karenin and his secret inability to cope with a woman weeping, as Anna does after confessing her affair. He feels a strange kind of relief, deciding Anna is damned and he need no longer concern himself with her or Serezha. He considers other cuckolded husbands from his social world, wondering what to do. To his consternation, he cannot face the idea of dueling Vronsky. He reminds himself his social position and statesman role also precludes it. Karenin’s other dilemma is that divorce is only possible if Anna’s adultery becomes public knowledge, which would humiliate him. He decides divorce would give Anna too much freedom: He wants her punished, saying, “I cannot be happy, but neither should she and he be happy” (282). The narrator insists that Karenin cannot openly acknowledge his desire for vengeance; instead, he claims that this state of affairs is what Christianity dictates.

Karenin returns home and writes Anna a letter in French describing his new vision for their future, namely, that she abandon Vronsky and restore their marriage—at least in society’s eyes. He summons her back to Petersburg. He has the letter sent and goes to his study. He finds himself absorbed in a portrait of Anna and imagines her mocking him. In an attempt to out-maneuver his opponents trying to make a scandal out of the state of agriculture in Southern Russia, he embarks on a new government project to form a commission about the state of minorities in the Russian empire. He goes to bed content.

Anna is briefly relieved to have told Karenin the truth, but does not tell Vronsky about her revelation. She realizes she did not do this because she feels “hopeless” (287), as Karenin may retaliate and she doubts Vronsky’s dedication to her. She, unlike Karenin, cannot turn to God, as a true repentance would require giving up Vronsky. When the maid reminds Anna of her son, she imagines taking him and leaving. She briefly sees him, overcome with an indecision Tolstoy calls “things beginning to go double in her soul” (290). She writes to Karenin that she is taking their son away and packs for Moscow, deciding not to inform Vronsky.

Anna receives Karenin’s letter, angered by his moralizing. With horror, she recalls her former life, as loveless marriage was a betrayal of herself. Imagining life as Vronsky’s mistress and as social outcast, she begins to “weep as punished children weep” (292-93). Anna is particularly tortured knowing she has no custodial rights to her child unless she remains married to Karenin. She sends Karenin an acknowledgment of his letter, abandons her travel plans, and goes to Betsy’s to look for Vronsky.

At Betsy’s, a croquet party is in progress, and Anna invents a fictitious visit to an acquaintance as cover for meeting Vronsky. Betsy helps her by posting a letter for Vronsky, to which Anna adds the meeting place and time at the end. Betsy suggests Anna is merely too sober about her own life and the matter of marriage and fidelity—especially compared to others present at the party.

The narrative turns to Vronsky, who, like Oblonsky, has debts compounded by his generosity to his brother and his mother’s withdrawal of financial support due to his affair. He feels he is Anna’s protector and defender, and accepts Karenin’s right to duel him. But Anna’s pregnancy is more complicated than anything he has encountered. He decides Anna is more important than his ambitions, even as he might, like his friend Sepukhovskoy, rise to an exalted rank if he devoted himself to the military. This friend knows of Vronsky’s affair with Anna and does not, precisely, disapprove. Sepukhovskoy gently suggests that marriage is better for a man’s career than a legally ambiguous affair.

On his way to meet Anna, Vronsky feels pleased with his life and the professional compliments Sepukhovskoy has paid him; he joyfully takes in the passing landscape. Anna is serious and sober, telling Vronsky Karenin now knows the full truth. The narrator says Vronsky anticipates a duel, not knowing Anna is thinking instead of her custody dilemma. Anna notes that Vronsky is not inviting her to run away with him and becomes anxious and irritable, insisting he read Karenin’s note. She says she will return to Karenin, and sees the situation as unresolvable. Vronsky sees she is upset but cannot share her dread over the loss of her son.

Karenin returns home, finding his professional success marred by Anna’s arrival. He reminds her of her duty to avoid scandal, and is particularly offended when she asks if he still expects physical intimacy. He angrily assures her he does not, but that he does expect socially irreproachable conduct.

Part 3 Chapters 24-32 Summary

The narrative returns to Levin and his farm. Levin is newly distracted and frustrated with the peasants, and his constant struggle to get them to work with modern methods and at the pace and schedule he thinks best. He is irritable and no longer happy with his work, and preoccupied with thoughts of Kitty’s proximity. Levin is angry at the idea of being Kitty’s second choice, and considers the idea of showing her he has forgiven the past degrading to both of them.

On his journey to visit a neighbor and forget his past worries, Levin stops with a prosperous peasant family. He is impressed with the man’s results and techniques on his farm, and is told that free peasants working for a landlord never produce as well. Unlike his brother, Levin’s friend Sviyazsky does not idolize the peasants and considers Russia backwards, but he peacefully works with his peasants and participates in local office. This apparent set of contradictions is surprising yet admirable to Levin.

Levin agrees that the emancipation of the serfs has harmed profits and the entire countryside—especially the argument that reforms could only be introduced “by authority alone” (331), as in the Russian state itself. The men debate the state of peasant society and economics. Levin is disconcerted to realize that Sviyazhsky is content to explore questions without resolving them. Levin decides to try a new system on his own farm, and leaves early to test it. He decides farming must be in accordance with national character, which is why European methods will not work.

Levin’s new plan is to make all his workers take shares in the farm profits, but finds his workers do not trust him or have time to hear the proposals. Levin decides existing European views of politics and economics, including philosophy, do not apply to Russia, so he focuses on his new book about traditional national methods and how they operate. His housekeeper urges him to marry.

He is unhappy and relieved when a guest arrives. It is his brother Nikolai, clearly very ill, but determined to talk of moving to Moscow for a civil service post. Their meeting makes it clear to Levin that all of his projects mean nothing as he will eventually die. Levin despairs of what to say or do for Nikolai.

Because the brothers cannot honestly speak about what troubles them, they quarrel over Levin’s farming and his politics. Nikolai accuses Levin of being a socialist but lacking the conviction to truly become one. The two men part from each other with fondness. Levin resolves to go to Europe to research his book, feeling that his work is his only escape from his newfound dread of mortality.

Part 3 Analysis

At this stage of the narrative, the main characters reach crisis points in some respects and in others, find themselves in stasis, trapped by social convention and their own indecision. Levin is still tormented by the purpose of his existence, though he is in better spirits the more time he spends in nature. Through him, Tolstoy argues that the Russian countryside is restorative in contrast to the corrupt city. He mows and finds respite in labor, unable to be truly offended by his liberal older brother’s disdain for his lifestyle. Unlike some of his peers, Levin accepts peasant emancipation as a moral and social necessity, as his brother Sergei does. His project, then, is to decide who he is without serfdom, though he casts this as a scientific study of agriculture.

Time in the fields, too, makes Levin realize he cannot marry a peasant or contentedly pursue single life, as merely the sight of Kitty’s carriage reminds him that he still loves her. Though he does not idolize the peasants the way other nobles do, he has a Russian conservative’s disdain for Europe—especially the aristocratic habit of speaking French. Even in the country, Levin remains haunted by Kitty’s refusal, unable to accept Dolly’s opinion of how difficult proposals are for women to navigate. Though he is not the chauvinist Oblonsky is, he does not see Dolly as an equal who has anything to offer him. He is, significantly, drawn to family life when he sees it in peasants: His own class seems to offer little comfort or a tolerable vision of the future.

Yet he cannot entirely escape his social reality: His agricultural project requires him to see and experience Europe as part of his broader need to escape the reminder of Nikolai’s illness. This part opens with Levin’s older brother and ends with his younger: In each case, Levin’s family pushes him to realize what his priorities are. Levin’s relationship with Nikolai reveals the questions that shape the rest of his journey. In Part One, Levin was clearly eager to discuss spiritual matters and the possibility of God’s existence. Nikolai’s illness forces Levin to consider mortality—a question he claims to have “forgotten.” Tolstoy hints that Levin is on a quest for purpose; it is clear he disdains shallow people who pursue only pleasure. Fear of death and the solution to this fear become a project for Levin, just as agriculture does.

In contrast to the liberals around him, Karenin sets himself up as a defender of tradition even more than Levin. Tolstoy does not shy away from Karenin’s faults: He is vengeful, bitter, and angry. He is drawn to a vision of a past that seems as unrealistic as any other aristocrat’s idealization of the peasantry. He imagines a restoration of a marriage that, if Anna’s later assertions are to be believed, was never truly harmonious or happy. Like Levin, Karenin’s work is his sole comfort and passion, and he finds himself in a silent war with Anna’s portrait. This epitomizes how much she haunts and shapes his life—even as he has much more social power than she ever will. For all Tolstoy’s language about Anna’s conscience and lost morality, Karenin is not a sympathetic figure. He is desperate to keep Anna caged because to do otherwise would upset his social position and sense of self. He sees no reason to ask why Anna would be unhappy, and seems to revel in her fear of him. Anna’s assessment that Karenin clings to his self-righteousness to make her feel small is never truly countered by his own behavior or anyone else’s view of him. For all that Tolstoy suggests Anna is wrong to commit adultery, he does not indicate that she was wrong to do so because her husband treated her well and is a good person. In deciding to remain married, Karenin is, perhaps, becoming a failure of masculinity. He cannot fathom dueling Vronsky to redress his affairs, and admitting he has been cuckolded—a requirement of divorce law—also seems too much for him. For as much as he casts himself as rational, Karenin lives in fear just as Anna does.

Anna’s dual nature—her private passion and domestic responsibilities—are at war, as she briefly contemplates leaving Vronsky to escape with her son. But she ultimately returns to Karenin, realizing she has no path to emancipation. Anna, like Levin, cannot manage to conduct herself as others in her world do. She cannot have an inconsequential society dalliance, but instead finds herself in a grand passion that wrecks her peace of mind. She cannot perform what is expected any more than Levin can, but her project is personal even as it touches on social reform: She is trying to escape her marriage, not reshape the institution. Her initial effort here fails because of her gender, and perhaps, her choice of partner. Vronsky cannot see that the aristocratic values of dueling and honor are of little consequence to Anna and are unlikely to matter to Karenin; he cannot acknowledge that her chief concern is her son, or truly accept that Karenin’s rights are socially binding and effectual. Vronsky sacrifices his career for Anna, but it does not bring him closer to understanding her nor to offering her the kind of rescue she craves.

For all that he disdains Europe, Levin manages to escape there while the other characters remain trapped in Russia.

The relationship between couples is an ongoing theme throughout the novel. Tolstoy hints that Kitty and Levin will reunite if Levin can bring himself to forgive the past. Levin is Dolly’s main comfort while Oblonsky is away, which highlights his failures as a husband. Dolly defines her entire life by her children and their behavior, and feels shame for their flaws in ways her husband never will. Dolly takes responsibility for their moral upbringing without Oblonsky’s support. Like Karenin, Dolly is an abandoned spouse, but owing to her gender, she is only saddled with more responsibility because of it.

Karenin offers Anna social protection, but no care or devotion. Vronsky, for his part, still sees his love affair as a triumph, though he does feel some responsibility for Anna’s plight. Anna first begins to doubt Vronsky’s regard once she has truly cast off her marriage. Vronsky’s inability to recognize Anna’s love for her son suggests he cannot protect her if he does not know what she cherishes. Levin’s politics and life trajectory echo Tolstoy’s own, as Pevear and Volokhonsky note in the introduction (xii). Thus, it is unsurprising that Tolstoy uses Levin to suggest that only marriage is real security in the world, and Anna’s love for Vronsky cannot replace it. Though Anna abandons any vision of her marriage as safety, the doubts that emerge during her pregnancy will shape much of the rest of her struggles to make her own life, and her tragic death.

blurred text
blurred text
blurred text
blurred text
Unlock IconUnlock all 94 pages of this Study Guide

Plus, gain access to 8,800+ more expert-written Study Guides.

Including features:

+ Mobile App
+ Printable PDF
+ Literary AI Tools